Haiti and Iraq
There are some in the Bush Administration who seem to believe that
by waving some kind of magic wand, the US and its allies can create
a stable democracy in Iraq. All you have to do, they say, is have
the right kind of elections and establish the right kind of
governing institutions. Then, when these things are properly set up,
they tell us, Presto! American troops will be able come home
permanently.
But this idea is simplistic and just so much damn fool nonsense.
What’s worse, it is a formula for future disaster, as anyone can
see, who has followed the events unfolding in Haiti.
Haiti, in fact, is one good reason why the US can never completely
withdraw from Iraq. There is no way the US and its allies can
just leave.
The US withdrew its troops
from Haiti in the year 2000, after going in there in 1994 to restore
a democratically elected leader. But things went downhill from that
day on. This is saying a lot when you understand that Haiti has one
of the highest unemployment rates, poverty rates and illiteracy
rates in Latin America; besides having no history of stable
democratic institutions.
After propping up Jean-Bertrand Aristide, and chasing out the
military officers who had earlier removed him from power, the US
pulled out of Haiti in 2000, leaving, of course, a power-vacuum.
Then, the same age-old pattern of rule by gangs and political thugs
started in again. Aristide (who has now fled the country) became
just another leader of one group of thugs who intended, it seems, to
use constitutional power to make Aristide simply another Haitian
dictator for life. He and his family and his cronies.
The murder,
torture, civil unrest , and outright brutality now going on from all
sides, is what should have been expected, once American troops left
that island nation.
Democracy can’t take hold in Haiti for many reasons. Poverty
is the main reason. Poverty is the rule in
Haiti and there is little chance of economic growth because there is
no rule of law and no real social infrastructure in the country.
Which means foreign investors tend to stay away. The economy and the
standard of living therefore keeps declining. And it doesn’t
look like things will get better anytime soon, not without some
long-term help.
Now look at Iraq.
There’s every reason to think that things in Iraq will turn out much
the same way Haiti did, no matter when (if ever) elections are held and some
sort of governing body established. In order to guarantee stability
in Iraq, the US and its allies will have to occupy that country for
many years to come. Perhaps several generations, until democratic
institutions are more or less well-established. Iraqis , like
Haitians, have not governed themselves in a democratic way in the
past and do not understand democracy in the Western sense.
And just
look at the Iraqis. If given a free hand, the Iraqis would
quickly elect either a religious fanatic and establish a theocracy,
or simply vote themselves another Baath dictatorship;--which
would rapidly turn Iraq into a carbon copy of the regime the US and
the UK recently took out.
As to Haiti, there is no real experience of democratic government
with its requirements for the rule of law, free elections, civil
liberties and the protection of private property.
If democracy is going to come to either Haiti or Iraq; a true democracy, the US and its allies will simply have to
assume some kind of permanent protectorate relationship with those
countries. It will probably entail some sort of military-civil
occupation which will require a long term commitment. Hopefully with
UN support. In other words for democracy to prevail in countries
with no history of democracy the US along with the UN must get
involved for the long haul and forget all this nonsense about
"exit strategies."
For Haiti and Iraq, there can be no exit strategy. Ignoring Haiti means having to deal with thousands of boat people trying to
escape to the US any way they can. Simply pulling out of Iraq means
another radical Islamic theocracy or the same kind of regime we just
spent so much blood and treasure on removing.
Anyway you cut it; the US, hopefully in cooperation with the UN, is
in for the long haul in both the Caribbean and the Middle East.
There’s just no other choice.
Punditwalla--